AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
As Barack Hussein Obama and John Kerry seem determined to reach a nuclear deal with Iranian leaders, they seem to be clueless as to the doctrines and desires of Islam.
Although apparently of the mindset that any deal is better than no deal, Obama and his advisors need to be aware that IRAN'S LEADERS CAN'T BE TRUSTED. That's because Muslims consider non-believers to be infidels, and Islam permits -- and even encourages -- Muslims to lie when dealing with infidels or when they feel that the tenets and goals of Islam are threatened.
When dealing with Muslims, it's important to realize that Muslims can communicate or negotiate with apparent sincerity, while in reality having the opposite agenda in their hearts. In regard to international negotiations, can Muslim countries be entrusted to faithfully adhere to any agreements they sign with non-Muslim nations? It's a religious tenet that when Muslims are weak, they may seem to agree with almost anything, but once they become strong, they have no problem in negating what they formerly agreed to.
Muslims may appear to be sincere while actually lying in the cause of Islam, and indeed, their religion grants them permission to lie. Without a doubt, Christians have also lied, but The Holy Bible doesn't grant them permission to lie. On the other hand, Muslims have no guilt because the Koran and Hadith permit deception, including gaining the trust of non-believers (infidels) in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
With direct reference to Muslim doctrine:
* Sura (16:106) ... Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell lies.
* Bukhari (49:857) ... "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." [In other words, lying is permitted when the end justifies the means].
* Bukhari (84:64-65) ... Speaking from a position of power, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."
* From Islamic Law (as per Page 746 of Reliance of the Traveler) ... "[it is] obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory ... Whether the purpose is war, settling a disagreement, or gaining the sympathy of a victim legally entitled to retaliate ... it is not unlawful to lie when any of these aims can only be attained through lying. But it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression ..."
CONCLUSION: Iranian leaders can utilize such "loopholes" in their religion to absolve them from permanent and supposedly binding negotiations. Importantly, what Muslim activists SAY isn't important to them; rather, it's what's actually meant in their hearts with regard to the goals and concepts of Islam. And some Muslims feel that they are earning their way to heaven by lying to non-Muslim infidels.
Americans have enough trouble in attempting to filter through all the lies told by U.S. politicians, and everyone should conclude that ANTI-AMERICAN IRANIAN POLITICIANS CAN'T BE TRUSTED AT ALL, especially when their religion "sanctions" lies and deception in the cause of Islam.
Although apparently of the mindset that any deal is better than no deal, Obama and his advisors need to be aware that IRAN'S LEADERS CAN'T BE TRUSTED. That's because Muslims consider non-believers to be infidels, and Islam permits -- and even encourages -- Muslims to lie when dealing with infidels or when they feel that the tenets and goals of Islam are threatened.
When dealing with Muslims, it's important to realize that Muslims can communicate or negotiate with apparent sincerity, while in reality having the opposite agenda in their hearts. In regard to international negotiations, can Muslim countries be entrusted to faithfully adhere to any agreements they sign with non-Muslim nations? It's a religious tenet that when Muslims are weak, they may seem to agree with almost anything, but once they become strong, they have no problem in negating what they formerly agreed to.
Muslims may appear to be sincere while actually lying in the cause of Islam, and indeed, their religion grants them permission to lie. Without a doubt, Christians have also lied, but The Holy Bible doesn't grant them permission to lie. On the other hand, Muslims have no guilt because the Koran and Hadith permit deception, including gaining the trust of non-believers (infidels) in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
With direct reference to Muslim doctrine:
* Sura (16:106) ... Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell lies.
* Bukhari (49:857) ... "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." [In other words, lying is permitted when the end justifies the means].
* Bukhari (84:64-65) ... Speaking from a position of power, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."
* From Islamic Law (as per Page 746 of Reliance of the Traveler) ... "[it is] obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory ... Whether the purpose is war, settling a disagreement, or gaining the sympathy of a victim legally entitled to retaliate ... it is not unlawful to lie when any of these aims can only be attained through lying. But it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression ..."
CONCLUSION: Iranian leaders can utilize such "loopholes" in their religion to absolve them from permanent and supposedly binding negotiations. Importantly, what Muslim activists SAY isn't important to them; rather, it's what's actually meant in their hearts with regard to the goals and concepts of Islam. And some Muslims feel that they are earning their way to heaven by lying to non-Muslim infidels.
Americans have enough trouble in attempting to filter through all the lies told by U.S. politicians, and everyone should conclude that ANTI-AMERICAN IRANIAN POLITICIANS CAN'T BE TRUSTED AT ALL, especially when their religion "sanctions" lies and deception in the cause of Islam.