AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Over and over, there is continued speculation in the lamestream media as to how the Russians may have helped swing the election in Donald Trump's favor. But if the Russians really did attempt to interfere in the November election, they couldn't have done more damage to Hillary Clinton than she did to herself.
So far, there has been no actual or credible evidence presented to suggest coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, yet the media, Democrats and liberals seem obsessed with a concept that somehow the Russians gave a big boost to Trump. But seriously, did the Russians in any way force Hillary to:
* conduct State Department business and send classified information on a private, unsecured server?
* delete and bleach more than 30,000 e-mails?
* fail to campaign in states like Michigan and Wisconsin because she already counted them in her column?
* lump all Trump supporters into a "deplorables" basket, calling them homophobic, racist, xenophobic, etc.?
* suffer a series of coughing spells and cause her to nearly faint and collapse after a speech?
* avoid any mention of radical Islamic terrorism?
* ignore the plight of four brave Americans, including our ambassador, in Benghazi, Libya?
* indicate that she'd put mines and miners out of business?
* cause herself to be the subject of FBI investigations?
* marginalize Bernie Sanders throughout the primaries and take part in DNC efforts to rig the election?
* run negative ads about Trump, rather than articulating her own message?
* be furnished debate questions in advance by the interim chairperson of the Democrat Party?
* allow Trump to have a more-resonant campaign message, focused on immigration, trade and terrorism?
* accept obscene amounts of money for giving corporate speeches?
* support unpopular trade deals, and being outdebated by Bernie Sanders on that issue?
* take a "low-energy" campaign approach, being badly outworked on the campaign trail by Trump?
* employ a campaign strategy with overemphasis on popular, rather than electoral, vote?
* etc., etc., etc.
So far, there has been no actual or credible evidence presented to suggest coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, yet the media, Democrats and liberals seem obsessed with a concept that somehow the Russians gave a big boost to Trump. But seriously, did the Russians in any way force Hillary to:
* conduct State Department business and send classified information on a private, unsecured server?
* delete and bleach more than 30,000 e-mails?
* fail to campaign in states like Michigan and Wisconsin because she already counted them in her column?
* lump all Trump supporters into a "deplorables" basket, calling them homophobic, racist, xenophobic, etc.?
* suffer a series of coughing spells and cause her to nearly faint and collapse after a speech?
* avoid any mention of radical Islamic terrorism?
* ignore the plight of four brave Americans, including our ambassador, in Benghazi, Libya?
* indicate that she'd put mines and miners out of business?
* cause herself to be the subject of FBI investigations?
* marginalize Bernie Sanders throughout the primaries and take part in DNC efforts to rig the election?
* run negative ads about Trump, rather than articulating her own message?
* be furnished debate questions in advance by the interim chairperson of the Democrat Party?
* allow Trump to have a more-resonant campaign message, focused on immigration, trade and terrorism?
* accept obscene amounts of money for giving corporate speeches?
* support unpopular trade deals, and being outdebated by Bernie Sanders on that issue?
* take a "low-energy" campaign approach, being badly outworked on the campaign trail by Trump?
* employ a campaign strategy with overemphasis on popular, rather than electoral, vote?
* etc., etc., etc.
Last edited:
