Interesting

9andaWiggle

Addicted Member
Must be Muslim. I don't think skin color is enough to stop the anti-gun rhetoric, but if a certain religion :Whistling: might be made to look bad, then a decision has to be made...
 

livespive

Well-Known Member
From the article:

"The mainstream media isn’t reporting on King’s rampage because he doesn’t fit the profile that supports their narrative. The incident involved a black man shooting what we suspect are black victims. Neither of these elements further the MSM’s narrative. Because of this, we do not plan on seeing this story dominate the MSM news cycle for the weeks to come."

Not enough white people dying.......

Back during the war on drugs it was fine as long as it stayed in the black neighborhoods. Once it got into the suburbs where Becky, and Johnny live then it got real..
 

WAMO

Spanking His Monkey
UMM, ACCORDING TO SOME ON HERE, A MASS SHOOTING DOENT EXIST UNLESS 6 OR MORE ARE KILLED.
 

Greg T.

The Jizz Slinger
UMM, ACCORDING TO SOME ON HERE, A MASS SHOOTING DOENT EXIST UNLESS 6 OR MORE ARE KILLED.
Funny you should catch that. It's about time . Now you understand. Some media use 2, some, 5, some 6, and THAT is why your stats are all fucked up.
 

livespive

Well-Known Member
Well but it is funny, don't they say it's a crime of passion, or wasn't mentally stable if someone shoots someone 5 or 6 times or more??

Funny you should catch that. It's about time . Now you understand. Some media use 2, some, 5, some 6, and THAT is why your stats are all fucked up.
 

Greg T.

The Jizz Slinger
Well but it is funny, don't they say it's a crime of passion, or wasn't mentally stable if someone shoots someone 5 or 6 times or more??
I'm not sure. Should we push for an "industry standard" ?? The liberals love to use 3 or more as their defining number because it furthers their anti-bill of rights agenda. The FBI used to use 5 or more to designate "mass murderer" regardless of the weapon. Then, for no apparent reason, 3 or more became the determining number when describing an "active shooter situation". Now, if you use the data from 1970 - 2013, and use 3 or more for the defining number you'll see a sharp decline in the numbers as time goes by and firearm sales increase. BUT, a person who kills 2 and himself and injures 10 or 15 is not entered into any of these "situations". So, was that person a mass murder? An active shooter? A mental case? Or.......?

So, where do we put the knifists? Knifers? Stabbers? Or the bombers? Or the arsonists, the gassers, the.............
 
Top