Mini-editorial: There's far too much air time for innuendo

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
With the "help" of the lamestream media, this nation is likely to lose one of the biggest benefits achieved in last November's election: an engaged population, including the voting bloc.

The overall dysfunction of Congress, the overreach of leftist-leaning courts and the inability to achieve truth and/or justice in any number of investigations tend to leave people angry and disinterested, and as a result, more and more are "tuning out."


Did Russia meddle in our elections? On one side or both? Was surveillance part of that? Who did the surveilling? Who ordered the surveilling? In the absence of answers, people don’t want to hear it. It is nothing but conjecture and innuendo without a scintilla of proof. Nothing should be revealed until investigations are complete, and then nothing but the facts.

There is real news to be covered by the lamestream media, and its news we need to know, NOT FAKE NEWS. What we don't need is air time filled with opinions, biases and sensationalism of news outlets.
 

Greg T.

The Jizz Slinger
The left ordered and perpetrated the surveillance, and then SCREAMED about it so as to put the attention and the eye of the public on to the right. It backfired as Trump proved that his tower was tapped.
 
Top