Despicable
- Thread starter Djarum300
- Start date
Can someone tell me I'm wrong to NOT believe that Putin will be defeated with us dumping money into Ukraine?
Conservatives on reddit genuinely believe Lindsay Graham talking points that Putin will invade a NATO country.
Sorry, but Putin only gets defeated if:
1. He dies.
2. Russians overthrow him (not happening)
3. WW3.
Why do conservatives think anything different?
Conservatives on reddit genuinely believe Lindsay Graham talking points that Putin will invade a NATO country.
Sorry, but Putin only gets defeated if:
1. He dies.
2. Russians overthrow him (not happening)
3. WW3.
Why do conservatives think anything different?
REVerse °
Addicted Member
"Nothing in this world operates the way you think it does. Banks do not loan money, governments are not empowered to protect you, the police department is not there to serve you, institutions of higher learning, colleges and educational institutes, are not there to educate you. The entire superstructure of civilization in the Western world is a combination of brilliantly put together and planned, well-planned, schemes to direct the minds of the people in such a way as to serve their masters."
~Jordan Maxwell, Matrix of Power: Secrets of World Control
~Jordan Maxwell, Matrix of Power: Secrets of World Control
REVerse °
Addicted Member
I've said for years politicians are loyal to lobbyists, not their voters. Not a stretch that some are loyal to the Intel community. Tucker isn't offering anything new here.
Tucker is becoming too much a conspiracy theorist / Rush Limbaugh and less the journalist he once was.
REVerse °
Addicted Member
His recent video regarding UAP/UFO studies was very intriguing and believable. Tucker is non partisan and Rush Limbaugh was a Conservative Republican. He was ready to blame Democratic Socialists for everything wrong with Washington. That was a mistake. The GOP are just as guilty. Rush was sharp, but I was disappointed with his blame game.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear Djarum300 and REVerse:
There's much truth in what you have posted here.
There's much truth in what you have posted here.
I don't think he's non partison. He's got his own opinions and that alones means he's siding one way or the other.
All these so called Republican senators:
I knew Britt was a rhino war hawk. Tubby didn't vote.
I knew Britt was a rhino war hawk. Tubby didn't vote.
REVerse °
Addicted Member
Dj if that were true- Anything that anyone says regarding current events, etc is partisan. Where do you draw the line? I am having trouble following your logic.
For the record: I agree with most of your logic here, but this one has me confused.
Rush was never ever a journalist and for years he was the voice of republicans/conservatives. He was a political analyst of sorts
Journalists are supposed to be unbiased. Report the facts. Tucker used to do this. He's a political analyst and has been for years but conservatives at times hold him up as a journalist or unbiased or non-partisan. He supports the populist movement which by default makes him partisan.
Journalists are supposed to be unbiased. Report the facts. Tucker used to do this. He's a political analyst and has been for years but conservatives at times hold him up as a journalist or unbiased or non-partisan. He supports the populist movement which by default makes him partisan.