Justice Dept will End Using Private Prisons

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
This is good news. When you lock people in cages and profit from it......that's a situation where corruption will thrive b/c there's incentive.....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...vate-prisons/?utm_term=.4fb9012338b6#comments

Justice Department says it will end use of private prisons

The Justice Department plans to end its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates announced the decision on Thursday in a memo that instructs officials to either decline to renew the contracts for private prison operators when they expire or “substantially reduce” the contracts’ scope. The goal, Yates wrote, is “reducing — and ultimately ending — our use of privately operated prisons.”

“They simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and as noted in a recent report by the Department’s Office of Inspector General, they do not maintain the same level of safety and security,” Yates wrote.

The Justice Department’s inspector general last week released a critical report concluding that privately operated facilities incurred more safety and security incidents than those run by the federal Bureau of Prisons. The private facilities, for example, had higher rates of assaults — both by inmates on other inmates and by inmates on staff — and had eight times as many contraband cellphones confiscated each year on average, according to the report. Yates said there are 13 privately run facilities under the Bureau of Prisons purview.

Disturbances in the facilities, the report said, led in recent years to “extensive property damage, bodily injury, and the death of a Correctional Officer.” The report listed several examples of mayhem at private facilities, including a May 2012 riot at the Adams County Correctional Center in Mississippi in which 20 people were injured and a correctional officer killed. That incident, according to the report, involved 250 inmates who were upset about low-quality food and medical care.

“The fact of the matter is that private prisons don’t compare favorably to Bureau of Prisons facilities in terms of safety or security or services, and now with the decline in the federal prison population, we have both the opportunity and the responsibility to do something about that,” Yates said in an interview.

The problems at private facilities were hardly a secret, and Yates said Justice Department and Bureau of Prisons officials had been talking for months about discontinuing their use. Mother Jones recently published a 35,000-word exposé detailing a reporter’s undercover work as a private prison guard in Louisiana — a piece that found serious deficiencies. The Nation magazine wrote earlier this year about deaths under questionable circumstances in privately operated facilities.

[Are private prisons better or worse than public prisons?]

The privately run facilities will not close overnight. Yates said the Justice Department would not terminate existing contracts but instead review those that come up for renewal. She said all the contracts would come up for renewal over the next five years.

It is possible the directive could face resistance from those companies that will be affected. In response to the inspector general’s report, the contractors running the prisons noted that their inmate populations consist largely of noncitizens, presenting them with challenges that government-run facilities do not have.

Scott Marquardt, president of Management and Training Corporation, wrote that comparing Bureau of Prisons facilities to privately operated ones was “comparing apples and oranges.” He generally disputed the inspector general’s report.

“Any casual reader would come to the conclusion that contract prisons are not as safe as BOP prisons,” Marquardt wrote. “The conclusion is wrong and is not supported by the work done by the [Office of the Inspector General].”

Yates, though, noted that the Bureau of Prisons was “already taking steps” to make her order a reality. Three weeks ago, she wrote, the bureau declined to renew a contract for 1,200 beds at the Cibola County Correctional Center in New Mexico. According to a local TV station, the county sheriff said the facility’s closure would have a negative impact on the community.

Yates wrote that the bureau also would amend a solicitation for a 10,800-bed contract to one for a maximum 3,600-bed contract. That, Yates wrote, would allow the Bureau of Prisons over the next year to discontinue housing inmates in at least three private prisons, and by May 1, 2017, the total private prison population would stand at less than 14,200 inmates. She said it was “hard to know precisely” when all the privately run facilities would no longer have federal inmates, though she noted that 14,200 was less than half the inmates they held at their apex three years ago, a figure she said indicated the department was “well on our way to ultimately eliminating the use of private prisons entirely.”

“We have to be realistic about the time it will take, but that really depends on the continuing decline of the federal prison population, and that’s really hard to accurately predict,” Yates said.

According to the inspector general’s report, private prisons housed roughly 22,660 federal inmates as of December 2015. That represents about 12 percent of the Bureau of Prisons total inmate population, according to the report.

In her memo, Yates wrote that the Bureau of Prisons began contracting with privately run institutions about a decade ago in the wake of exploding prison populations, and by 2013, as the federal prison population reached its peak, nearly 30,000 inmates were housed in privately operated facilities. But in 2013, Yates wrote, the prison population began to decline because of efforts to adjust sentencing guidelines, sometimes retroactively, and to change the way low-level drug offenders are charged. She said the drop in federal inmates gave officials the opportunity to reevaluate the use of private prisons.

Yates wrote that private prisons “served an important role during a difficult time period,” but they had proven less effective than facilities run by the government. The contract prisons are operated by three private corporations, according to the inspector general’s report: Corrections Corporation of America, GEO Group and Management and Training Corporation. The Bureau of Prisons spent $639 million on private prisons in fiscal year 2014, according to the report.

Yates said it was “really hard to determine whether private prisons are less expensive” and whether their closure would cause costs to go up, though she said officials did not anticipate having to hire additional Bureau of Prisons staff.

“Bottom line, I’d also say, you get what you pay for,” Yates said."
 

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
A few comments on the article I like:

"private prison lobbies have actually lobbied for harsher sentencing..think about how corrupt that is.."

"There are a couple of things that make this a good idea. One privatized prisons are profit motivated. If they can find any excuse to extend a prisoners sentence it is to the corporation’s best interest to do so. Second; crime and incarceration is a society problem and society’s responsibility to manage and pay the costs through local, state, and federal taxes. That would place a higher priority on training and rehabilitation rather then punishment which nets the tax payers nothing but expense and revolving prison terms for repeat offenders."
 

MI2AZ

Active Member
I am glad to see them ending this. I always wondered if perhaps there wasn't some money being passed from the prison corporations to judges, prosecutors, and politicians to help their 'business' grow.
 

WAMO

Spanking His Monkey
THATS A CAN OF WORMS BEING OPENED. CARRY THAT FORWARD TO ANY PRIVATE BUSINESS THAT WORKS WITH OR FOR THE GOVERNMENT.
 

WAMO

Spanking His Monkey
I WAS REFERING TO ALL THE OTHER COMPANIES THAT WORK WITH THE GOVERNMENT. MAYBE THEY WILL START WITH THEIR OWN MUNITIONS, PLANES, TANKS, ETC, ETC...
 

WAMO

Spanking His Monkey
9 WOULD KNOW MORE. HEARD HERE ON THE NEWS IN DALLAS LAST NIGHT THAT HOUSTON IS CLOSING A STATE RUN PRISON.
 

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
I'm with you on that one. Never should penal colony be run privately. BUT, we all know that everything government touches goes to fuck in short order. What IS the answer?
I think it starts with the legalization of weed and acknowledging the level of fail the war on drugs has been. So many non-violent offenders aren't a threat to society and individuals and are locked up. Prison should contain society's murderers / burglars / rapists / aggravated robberies / DUI's / violent people etc, not the guy with a J in his possession. The people who go to jail won't go to jail b/c of the drugs.....they will b/c they've committed crimes.

Again, nothing is perfect in this situation, but eliminating for-profit prisons is a good start that will reap benefits to society.
 

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
If EVERYONE got the same treatment regarding the law as Bill and Hillary Clinton, there would be no need for any type of prisons or places of incarceration.
 

Greg T.

The Jizz Slinger
I think it starts with the legalization of weed and acknowledging the level of fail the war on drugs has been. So many non-violent offenders aren't a threat to society and individuals and are locked up. Prison should contain society's murderers / burglars / rapists / aggravated robberies / DUI's / violent people etc, not the guy with a J in his possession. The people who go to jail won't go to jail b/c of the drugs.....they will b/c they've committed crimes.

Again, nothing is perfect in this situation, but eliminating for-profit prisons is a good start that will reap benefits to society.
You're right about the recreational pot smoker. But we can't lay out a blanket law about "drugs" and decriminalize everything. Nobody has died from pot so that one is a given. But the meth cookers, heroin chemists, etc. must be dealt with because they, in part, responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Yeah, I know, nobody put a gun to the junkies heads and made them do drugs. But the people supplying deadly substances need to be stopped, as well as the flow of illicit drugs across the borders. But pot should be fully legalized anyway, and that would take a large load off of our penal system.
 

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
You're right about the recreational pot smoker. But we can't lay out a blanket law about "drugs" and decriminalize everything. Nobody has died from pot so that one is a given. But the meth cookers, heroin chemists, etc. must be dealt with because they, in part, responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Yeah, I know, nobody put a gun to the junkies heads and made them do drugs. But the people supplying deadly substances need to be stopped, as well as the flow of illicit drugs across the borders. But pot should be fully legalized anyway, and that would take a large load off of our penal system.
I think this is a fair point. It would certainly be a step in the right direction.
 
Top