Ted Cruz: It's Official
- Thread starter Spider
- Start date
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
... or because the Democrats can't come up with any other suitable challengers.
Good Times Good Times
Active Member
I'd be up for being the nominee.......wait, I'm 31....................DAMN THE CONSTITUTION!
bbfreeburn
Active Member
Whoever the Republicans nominate one thing you can guarantee. It will be someone unelectable. The Tea party and their ilk will have far too much say in the matter to put forth an actual electable candidate.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear bbfreeburn:
It doesn't really matter who the GOP candidate is, as I've already concluded and GUARANTEED that no future U.S. president will ever again be elected under the Republican banner.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear Cool Rocking Daddy:
Of course, I don't have any influence or control over the election outcome, but I should have the right to make predictions and conclusions, and all logic brings me to the conclusion that no GOP candidate can win the presidency in the 2016 election.
Do you disagree with me? Do you see any possibility of a GOP victory in 2016?
9andaWiggle
Addicted Member
On these specific counts (especially 1 and 2), he can't be much worse than Obama has been...
bbfreeburn
Active Member
I'm waiting for Donald Trump demand that he produce his birth certificate.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear bbfreeburn:
Hasn't it already been established that a president can be elected without having produced a birth certificate?
He was stealing Santorum's thunder! But Walker was even doing that - red meat for the Base.
Dem's version of red meat is taking from the evil rich to hand out more freebies. They all stay on script.
Dem's version of red meat is taking from the evil rich to hand out more freebies. They all stay on script.
Good Times Good Times
Active Member
They are professionals are the hundred questions game. That's "what they do".
To the OP......I do like Rand and not Cruz. They are similar in some ways, I do look to Rand more for foreign policy. My worldview is entirely different than Ted Cruz.
bbfreeburn
Active Member
Umm, no.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear bbfreeburn:
Please enlighten me as to when (and to whom) Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate was produced prior to his 2008 election.
Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
Looks like one is not necessary BEFORE the election, as long as you produce a fake one sometime DURING your reign as King.
bbfreeburn
Active Member
Bill why would I try and "enlighten" you? It was in all the papers, as a well known sage would say.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear bbfreeburn:
I certainly don't recall Barack Hussein Obama's official birth certificate being released prior to the 2008 election. If it was in "all the papers" (as you indicate), how about providing me with at least one link to that information? I can't find any information on the release of Obama's birth certificate prior to April 27, 2011, so it must NOT have been "in the papers" and in the public domain.
bbfreeburn
Active Member
So now you want to quibble about dates? Now about that "without a birth certificate" thing. Did Washington produce his birth certificate? Jefferson? Hoover? Who actually was elected to office after producing a birth certificate? Um, no one would be the answer. Did they exist? I guess we have historically assumed that they did. Perhaps, since we all know black folks lie, that assumption cannot obtain with our current President? Tell us what you think.
Or equivocate as usual.
Or equivocate as usual.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
... and all that only enhances my contention that it has already been established that a president can be elected without having produced a birth certificate ... so I'm correct again ... and Always Write ... right?
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
... but just because Barack Hussein Obama is prone to tell lies doesn't lead to a conclusion that "black folks lie."