Tucker Carlson says 'We're speeding toward assassination"

[AlwaysWrite]

Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has suggested that former President Donald Trump could be targeted for assassination.

Carlson, who made the comment while being interviewed by Adam Carolla, noted that Trump has been the subject of criticism, protests, impeachments, and indictments.

"We're speeding toward assassination, obviously," Carlson said, adding that "permanent Washington, both parties, have decided that there's something about Trump which is so threatening" toward them that they cannot have him in office."

'We're speeding toward assassination': Tucker Carlson says 'permanent Washington' finds Trump threatening

Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has suggested that former President Donald Trump could be targeted for assassination.Carlson, who made the comment while being interviewed by Adam Carolla, noted that Trump has been the subject of criticism, protests, impeachments, and indictments. "We're...

www.theblaze.com

 

[Djarum300]

I'm really disappointed with his Trump interview. Softball all the way.

 

[Scolai]

Tucker is slowly devolving into a conspiracy nut. How long before he goes full Alex Jones on us?

If mainstream Washington wants a war, let them permanently 'take out' Trump. I can't even begin to fathom what that would look like in the public eye - and their reaction to it.

Let's hope Tucker's prophecy remains in the realm of his imagination.

 

[Djarum300]

Alex jones has been known to be right sometimes, lol. Isn't it the saying just wait and the conspiracy turns into reality?

The left can just keep finding indictments for Trump. No need for anything else.

 

[AlwaysWrite]

Alex jones has been known to be right sometimes, lol. Isn't it the saying just wait and the conspiracy turns into reality?

The left can just keep finding indictments for Trump. No need for anything else.

... but they know what they'll face if the DOJ is controlled by Trump instead of Biden!

 

[Djarum300]

... but they know what they'll face if the DOJ is controlled by Trump instead of Biden!

DOJ was controlled by Trump and he did nothing

 

[AlwaysWrite]

DOJ was controlled by Trump and he did nothing

... but do you really think he'll "do nothing" if he gets back in the Oval Office?

 

[Greg T.]

... but do you really think he'll "do nothing" if he gets back in the Oval Office?

I believe Trump was a bit naive his first time around. AG, FBI, CIA, DOJ all corrupt as fuck and he was overwhelmed. I believe he's gained a lot of knowledge these past Biden years and is ready to gut the carp. But he's going to need full control of the house and senate, and that means cleaning the rinos.

 

[Djarum300]

... but do you really think he'll "do nothing" if he gets back in the Oval Office?

I don't think he can. Does the president have the authority to fire 1000s of DOJ employees? If he does, will he? He's hired some terrible people in his administration he stabbed him in the back.(Bill bar, pence, Bolton...)

Honestly it requires the the DOJ to be rebuilt from the ground up.

 

[AlwaysWrite]

I believe Trump was a bit naive his first time around. AG, FBI, CIA, DOJ all corrupt as fuck and he was overwhelmed. I believe he's gained a lot of knowledge these past Biden years and is ready to gut the carp. But he's going to need full control of the house and senate, and that means cleaning the rinos.

Dear Greg T:

He has gained a lot of knowledge and A LOT of MOTIVATION!

 

[AlwaysWrite]

I don't think he can. Does the president have the authority to fire 1000s of DOJ employees? If he does, will he? He's hired some terrible people in his administration he stabbed him in the back.(Bill bar, pence, Bolton...)

Honestly it requires the the DOJ to be rebuilt from the ground up.

Dear Djarum300:

At least, if he gets back in office, he owes it to the country to TRY!

 

[Scolai]

Alex jones has been known to be right sometimes, lol. Isn't it the saying just wait and the conspiracy turns into reality?

The left can just keep finding indictments for Trump. No need for anything else.

Alex Jones is a crackpot who just got handed a major nut shot for his perpetuation of hoaxes surrounding the Sandy Hook event and the victims' families. I'm not a fan, even if he does find a truth nugget every now and again.

Nonetheless, Tucker is waxing nuttier and nuttier as the months pass after his firing. Let's hope he can rein that nonsense in a bit.

 

[Djarum300]

Alex Jones is a crackpot who just got handed a major nut shot for his perpetuation of hoaxes surrounding the Sandy Hook event and the victims' families. I'm not a fan, even if he does find a truth nugget every now and again.

Nonetheless, Tucker is waxing nuttier and nuttier as the months pass after his firing. Let's hope he can rein that nonsense in a bit.

I like him for pure entertainment. I've seen all the footage for Sandy hook. He apologized for it. Has CNN apologized to Sandman? Have they apologized for Russia gate?

How was what he did any different than what all the major news companies have been doing for years with Russia gate or even Covid? He's responsible for some nut jobs showing up at residences? That's about like saying Trump is responsible for J6. Or a nut job for punching another person for not wearing a mask because CNN said that if you didn't grandma is going to die.

 

[Scolai]

He's responsible for some nut jobs showing up at residences?

I will point you to a book that you need to read on the Alex Jones/Sandy Hook affair. Once you read it - and you need to read it - then let me know if you still hold the opinion quoted above.

 

[Djarum300]

I will point you to a book that you need to read on the Alex Jones/Sandy Hook affair. Once you read it - and you need to read it - then let me know if you still hold the opinion quoted above.

Can the author be trusted? Not that I trust anyone writing for Alex Jones side ( or anyone's for that matter) but I just doubt anything I read or see.

I watched videos and read transcripts that the plaintiffs used for his lawsuit. Keep in mind a judge ruled him guilty in one trial because his defense lawyer didn't present evidence which never existed ( most lawyers thought that was ridiculous by the judge ).

Do I think he defamed/libeled? Yes. But that standard has to be used against all networks and media, and it never is.

 

[REVerse °]

Can the author be trusted? Not that I trust anyone writing for Alex Jones side ( or anyone's for that matter) but I just doubt anything I read or see.

I watched videos and read transcripts that the plaintiffs used for his lawsuit. Keep in mind a judge ruled him guilty in one trial because his defense lawyer didn't present evidence which never existed ( most lawyers thought that was ridiculous by the judge ).

Do I think he defamed/libeled? Yes. But that standard has to be used against all networks and media, and it never is.

THIS ^^^

 

[Scolai]

Can the author be trusted? Not that I trust anyone writing for Alex Jones side ( or anyone's for that matter) but I just doubt anything I read or see.

When I tell you who Elizabeth Williamson is, your first response will be some iteration of the genetic fallacy. You'll complain about the source, and her employer, and her left-leaning ideology (which is evident in this book). Nevertheless, I'll share:

Williamson is an investigative reporter for the New York Times. Her liberal bias is generally directed at Trump (who praised Alex Jones during his 2016 presidential run), but her analysis of the Sandy Hook event and Jones's role in perpetuating falsehoods is on-point.

I watched videos and read transcripts that the plaintiffs used for his lawsuit. Keep in mind a judge ruled him guilty in one trial because his defense lawyer didn't present evidence which never existed ( most lawyers thought that was ridiculous by the judge ).

Jones's team failed to provide evidence that the Sandy Hook massacre was a false flag event or a hoax. In the absence of any evidence, the judge was forced to rule in favor of the plaintiffs, who actually produced evidence that Noah Pozner was a real human being who was actually shot in the head in his classroom - something that Jones had insisted online for years was untrue. As a result of Jones's inane insistence that Sandy Hook was a hoax, victims' families were doxxed and forced to move repeatedly over the course of years for fear of their lives.

Do I think he defamed/libeled? Yes. But that standard has to be used against all networks and media, and it never is.

He did a lot more than that. He repeatedly put people's lives in jeopardy to enrich himself. Jones deserved just what he got from the outcome of the trials.

 

[REVerse °]

I'm not a Jones fan. Can't stand the guy. Acts like a WWE wrestler.

Did the author comment on the "multiple" shooters inside the school that were dressed in black with face masks? Or other supposed "paid actors" that were seen dressed as cops at other shootings. I have followed these events very closely with near obsession. I have seen evidence removed from YouTube and Facebook that proves there was more to these events than being reported. I do not deny this event happened and the tragedy is so horrific words can not describe. I'm sure there is some truth to what the author says (don't get me wrong) but until this event is dissected by a neutral party- I think the public is being misled. Hopefully a whistleblower will step forward with some facts. My research tells me this event did happen, but "others" were involved. A major coverup. Some very, very powerful people want the 2nd Amendment abolished. Manipulate the public with a mass shooting that involves children and utilize the media to lead a pep rally. We are dealing with dark forces of evil.

 

[Greg T.]

I'm not a Jones fan. Can't stand the guy. Acts like a WWE wrestler.

Did the author comment on the "multiple" shooters inside the school that were dressed in black with face masks? Or other supposed "paid actors" that were seen dressed as cops at other shootings. I have followed these events very closely with near obsession. I have seen evidence removed from YouTube and Facebook that proves there was more to these events than being reported. I do not deny this event happened and the tragedy is so horrific words can not describe. I'm sure there is some truth to what the author says (don't get me wrong) but until this event is dissected by a neutral party- I think the public is being misled. Hopefully a whistleblower will step forward with some facts. My research tells me this event did happen, but "others" were involved. A major coverup. Some very, very powerful people want the 2nd Amendment abolished. Manipulate the public with a mass shooting that involves children and utilize the media to lead a pep rally. We are dealing with dark forces of evil.

I've also followed the Sandy hook incident as well as the Charleston incident. Shot doesn't add up. There were people interviewed who showed up and were interviewed for other incidents as well. I firmly believe the FBI or CIA is in on this in order to push the gun grab. I had downloaded the Federal Law Enforcement Training schedules for both 2012 and 1015. I lost the one for Newtown, but I still have the one for Charleston. They clearly showed an active shooter training session going on for the week the shootings took place. Below, you'll find the one for Charleston. BTW, the Charleston shooting took place June 17, 2015. Coinky Dink? I think not.

 

[REVerse °]

...There were people interviewed who showed up and were interviewed for other incidents as well. I firmly believe the FBI or CIA is in on this in order to push the gun grab.

Exactly.

That's part of the actors to which I was speaking.

"The horror." - Apocalypse Now