AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Judge Jeanine Pirro's opening statement demonstrates how there is one "system of justice" for average Americans and another "system of justice" for Hillary Clinton ...
That's better than having a separate set of laws just for her.AND WHAT IF THAT HAPPENS WHILE SHE IS IN OFFICE? ARE WE PREPARED FOR HER VP TO TAKE OVER?
Dear WAMO:AND WHAT IF THAT HAPPENS WHILE SHE IS IN OFFICE? ARE WE PREPARED FOR HER VP TO TAKE OVER?
Dear Greg T:Some day we can only hope it will catch up with her and she'll rot in fucking prison.
Dear Greg T:
Sounds good. She DESERVES to be incarcerated. But ... [see my above response to WAMO]
You do know that the Attorney General would not be the one to bring charges if she becomes President, right? It would then become an impeachment procedure that is initiated in the House. My guess is that if it were to happen, Trey Gowdy would act as the prosecutor in the Senate hearing. He would not use Comey as any type of witness, he would call on the FBI agents who actually worked the case.Dear WAMO:
There's no way that could happen. She already has the FBI director in her pocket, and if she is elected, do you think she'd have any worries that her attorney general would bring charges against her?
She's broken so many laws already, and she remains untouched. Why would/could anything change if she becomes president?
... but do you think that James Comey would "turn on her" and risk an unusual suicide?We could only hope that she pisses them off, and they turn on her.
Dear Robadat:You do know that the Attorney General would not be the one to bring charges if she becomes President, right? It would then become an impeachment procedure that is initiated in the House. My guess is that if it were to happen, Trey Gowdy would act as the prosecutor in the Senate hearing. He would not use Comey as any type of witness, he would call on the FBI agents who actually worked the case.
This is all moot because in order to impeach it has to be 2/3 vote, or 67 Senators voting for removal. We all know that not one dem in the Senate would ever vote to remove her no matter how damning the evidence against her is, so she would not be convicted in the Senate. The House Repubs know this and that is why they would not even gets the votes to initiate an Impeachment against her...