Good Times Good Times
Active Member
-John Kelly
-Kellyanne Conway
-Don McGahn
-James Mattis
-Dan Coats
-Larry Kudlow
-Mike Pompeo
-Ivanka Trump
-some deputy no one's ever heard of
-write-in
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
"But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.
...
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
...
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over."
So really, I'm just trying to gauge WHO it is, as opposed to analyzing the opinion itself.....
-Kellyanne Conway
-Don McGahn
-James Mattis
-Dan Coats
-Larry Kudlow
-Mike Pompeo
-Ivanka Trump
-some deputy no one's ever heard of
-write-in
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resistance.html
"But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.
That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.
The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.
...
Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.
...
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over."
So really, I'm just trying to gauge WHO it is, as opposed to analyzing the opinion itself.....
