BREAKING NEWS....ZIMMERMAN SHOT...

Guess you didn't look at the picture of Zimmy's truck with a hole thru the side window. With those tinted windows, there's no way in hell that guy could see a dark gray gun (Glock 22) in his hand while driving in his own car, that also had tinted windows...

You beat all

Why aren't you calling this shooter a racist, obviously he hates hispanic jews...

He was stalking Zim, the incident between the two men happened last year, this wasn't a spur of the moment road rage thing...
He saw what looked like Zimm's truck and fired a shot into it, what would have happened if Zim had a passenger in that truck with him? The man should have been arrested immediately by the Police, he put the lives of innocent people in danger by shooting at a moving vehicle...if he had been lucky enough to hit Zim, he could have easily caused an accident where other innocent people minding their own business could have been injured or killed by an out of control vehicle.

Now robby...He fired 1 shot...come on...if you are involved in road rage...and someone waves their gun at you...
you fire and often....oh and BTW...the story I read said Zimmy waved his gun first...Then the other guy pulled
his gun and fired....So much for tinted windows....

Now why would you think this qualifies for someone being a racist???

Like I said...the story I read said that zimmy boy waved his gun FIRST....So just how does that make
the shooter here a racist???


Now it seems like you want the shooter here convicted without a trial..."the man should have been arrested
immediately" without all the facts being known???? Man you sure change your opinions...

If I said someone should have been charged, you and your boy toy bash away...saying stupid stuff like he deserves a trial... But NOW IT'S OK THAT YOU SAY THE MAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED BEFORE THE FACTS ARE KNOWN...


once again robby


you beat all
 
Rob,

That is kind of what I am saying now. The guy can say anything and because of zim's past he can just about get away with it.
The cops will say Zim was probably packing.

Guess you didn't look at the picture of Zimmy's truck with a hole thru the side window. With those tinted windows, there's no way in hell that guy could see a dark gray gun (Glock 22) in his hand while driving in his own car, that also had tinted windows...

You beat all

Why aren't you calling this shooter a racist, obviously he hates hispanic jews...

He was stalking Zim, the incident between the two men happened last year, this wasn't a spur of the moment road rage thing...
He saw what looked like Zimm's truck and fired a shot into it, what would have happened if Zim had a passenger in that truck with him? The man should have been arrested immediately by the Police, he put the lives of innocent people in danger by shooting at a moving vehicle...if he had been lucky enough to hit Zim, he could have easily caused an accident where other innocent people minding their own business could have been injured or killed by an out of control vehicle.
 
ZIMMERMAN DID HAVE A GUN. THE STORY I READ, AN EYE WITNESS SAID, ZIMMERMAN NEVER DISPLAYED A GUN. THE ONLY GUY WHO SAID HE DID WAS THE SHOOTER.
 
Now robby...He fired 1 shot...come on...if you are involved in road rage...and someone waves their gun at you...
you fire and often....oh and BTW...the story I read said Zimmy waved his gun first...Then the other guy pulled
his gun and fired....So much for tinted windows....

Now why would you think this qualifies for someone being a racist???

Like I said...the story I read said that zimmy boy waved his gun FIRST....So just how does that make
the shooter here a racist???


Now it seems like you want the shooter here convicted without a trial..."the man should have been arrested
immediately" without all the facts being known???? Man you sure change your opinions...

If I said someone should have been charged, you and your boy toy bash away...saying stupid stuff like he deserves a trial... But NOW IT'S OK THAT YOU SAY THE MAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED BEFORE THE FACTS ARE KNOWN...


once again robby


you beat all
Well, IF someone takes a shot at me, and I have my gun in my hand, I'm firing back. That is instinctive reaction and self-defense...

This story you are quoting is from the shooter's lawyer, why do you believe him? It's obvious he's lying to save his client's ass.
Relook at the picture of Zim's truck, can you see anything inside it thru the window? That window was not open, he fired a shot thru a darkly tinted window, he couldn't see anything inside that truck.

Actually, I don't want him convicted without a trial, but preliminary evidence shows "probable cause" that he should be arrested and charged with a crime because his explanations simply don't jibe with the available evidence...

1 - He says, Zimmerman had his gun in his hand, yet Zimm's widows were darkly tinted and this guy made a u-turn to follow after him...
Is it reasonable to follow a guy that just pointed a gun at you? Or do you try to get away from him?

2 - After making his u-turn to follow Zim's vehicle, he pulls up alongside the vehicle and shoots thru a darkly tinted window at the driver's position. To me, based on the accounts given, first impression is that act was pre-meditated based on events that happened several months ago...

This guy is no better and probably much worse than Zimmerman. He's looking for the notoriety of being the guy that finally gives Zimmerman his just rewards by offing him. Probably make him a hero in your eyes...just makes him another murderer in mine...

.
 
Well, IF someone takes a shot at me, and I have my gun in my hand, I'm firing back. That is instinctive reaction and self-defense...

This story you are quoting is from the shooter's lawyer, why do you believe him? It's obvious he's lying to save his client's ass.
Relook at the picture of Zim's truck, can you see anything inside it thru the window? That window was not open, he fired a shot thru a darkly tinted window, he couldn't see anything inside that truck.

Actually, I don't want him convicted without a trial, but preliminary evidence shows "probable cause" that he should be arrested and charged with a crime because his explanations simply don't jibe with the available evidence...

1 - He says, Zimmerman had his gun in his hand, yet Zimm's widows were darkly tinted and this guy made a u-turn to follow after him...
Is it reasonable to follow a guy that just pointed a gun at you? Or do you try to get away from him?

2 - After making his u-turn to follow Zim's vehicle, he pulls up alongside the vehicle and shoots thru a darkly tinted window at the driver's position. To me, based on the accounts given, first impression is that act was pre-meditated based on events that happened several months ago...

This guy is no better and probably much worse than Zimmerman. He's looking for the notoriety of being the guy that finally gives Zimmerman his just rewards by offing him. Probably make him a hero in your eyes...just makes him another murderer in mine...

.


You haven't learned yet? JLS makes up his mind immediately upon hearing about an incident and then finds a news report that supports his beliefs.
 
You haven't learned yet? JLS makes up his mind immediately upon hearing about an incident and then finds a news report that supports his beliefs.
Of course he does...
He still hasn't learned that I look at all the facts in evidence available (from multiple news sites) and then make my assesment of the situation based on the facts presented and my experiences. I also can and will change my opinions when further evidence is provided that indicates to me my initial assesment maybe wrong based on info that wasn't previously available to me.
 
Yeah, this whole "Waiting for the facts to come in" thing just doesn't compute with jls. Don't we "beat all" ?
 
I'm curious as to why only the first half the 911 call has been released...would like to have heard the entire 911 call...
would most likely give me a better grasp of the shooter's mindset, but based on what I did hear, I have to say it sounds like he wanted it to be known he shot George Zimmerman...not a good thought process...
 
What is the ethnicity of the shooter? All I see online is pics of Zimmerman, none of the suspect.

Here you go, 9~

550x309
 
Rob and your boy toy....that be you greg....Fat boy zimmy has a history of pulling out his gun...

Really....It was in all the papers and on the tele...

You may recall....He shot Martin....Had an incident with his wife...and now this case of road rage....

THEREFORE MR. NYPD BLUE....THAT IS WHY I TEND TO BELIEVE WHAT THE SHOOTER'S LAWYER
SAID....


IF THAT'S OK WITH YOU....


IF NOT



WHO FUXXCKING CARES...



Now greegie boy....were you there...did you see or not see in zimmy waved his gun...BUT YOU AND ROBBY BOY HAVE MADE UP YOUR MINES...THAT FAT ASS ZIMMY...DID NOTHING WRONG...


A little bias???
 
Rob and your boy toy....that be you greg....Fat boy zimmy has a history of pulling out his gun...

Really....It was in all the papers and on the tele...

You may recall....He shot Martin....Had an incident with his wife...and now this case of road rage....

THEREFORE MR. NYPD BLUE....THAT IS WHY I TEND TO BELIEVE WHAT THE SHOOTER'S LAWYER
SAID....


IF THAT'S OK WITH YOU....


IF NOT



WHO FUXXCKING CARES...



Now greegie boy....were you there...did you see or not see in zimmy waved his gun...BUT YOU AND ROBBY BOY HAVE MADE UP YOUR MINES...THAT FAT ASS ZIMMY...DID NOTHING WRONG...


A little bias???
The only one biased here is you...

Zim legally shot Martin in self-defense. It was in all the papers and on the Telly. He didn't wave his gun around before shooting Martin. But you in your biased hatred of someone you don't know from a hill of beans, can't accept the jury's decision...

He had an incident with his wife, where she falsely accused him of waving his gun. She later owned up to lying about the gun part...but you, in your bias, refuse to acknowledge that she lied, even after she admitted he didn't flash his gun...

It's really simple, jls. The evidence that has been released so far, does not support the claims made by the shooter's lawyer.
1 - The window tint does not allow one to see clearly into the vehicle. I do not believe he saw a gun in zim's hand.
2 - He followed Zim's vehicle and pulled up alongside it, then fired a shot into it. Those are not actions a reasonable person would do IF they saw the other driver point a gun in his direction. A reasonable person would have not made a u-turn to follow the vehicle and definitely would not pull up along side it to give that person he believes is holding a gun an opportunity to shoot him.

Those are the reasons I do not believe his lawyer's story, the facts don't add up...
No bias, No BS, just the facts...
 
Robby....If what you say is true....Why hasn't he been charged...

Waiting for your bull shixxt BIAS answer...

Lets see....Greg or Robby are walking home from the candy store...And someone in a pickup truck starts
following them...Now more than likely they are both armed...But Martin was not...

Now more than likely Greg and Robby boy will take some action and defend themselves...NOT WITH THEIR FISTS....BUT WITH A GUN...

BUT MARTIN DID NOT HAVE A GUN....HE HAD A CAN OF ICE TEA...SO HE USED HIS FISTS TO DEFEND
HIMSELF...AND FAT BOY ZIMMY...SHOT HIM DEAD...


And Greg and Robby think this is OK...BUT WE ALL KNOW...THEY WOULD HAVE SHOT ZIMMY...

CAUSE WE ALL KNOW THE FAMOUS WORDS OF GREG...."pump 3 slugs into his chest"


FUXXCKING HYPOCRITES....IT'S OK FOR THEM TO USE THEIR GUNS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST SOMEONE WHO IS STALKING THEM....BUT IF MARTIN USED HIS BABY FINE FISTS...HE DESERVED DEATH...

Zimmy's 911 call..."he looks like he is on drugs or something and up to no good"

sure sounds like racial profiling to me...


you two make me sick


now fuxxck off
 
Sure I would use my gun..........IF I felt my life was in danger. Is that not what self defense is?
 
Back
Top