Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
Not for obvious reasons, but I don't not favor a cut for the elderly or disabled. The disabled are obviously not able and available for work, and the elderly have put their time in and paid their dues to collect retirement. I would not expect the disabled and elderly to supplement their income unless voluntarily.He's a good impartial read (slightly dated but relevant): http://www.cbpp.org/research/contra...of-entitlement-benefits-go-to?fa=view&id=3677
If we're going to cut here to the elderly and disabled as well as the non-working poor (which, big-picture, statistically is a smaller number that most of us realize) let's cut some defense spending as well. Plenty of room there to make an even bigger fiscally conservative cut.
So, I think that there are plenty of places to look, that can be even MORE effective to trim up on some spending.
But I do understand what your target dislike is. I do and I don't think you're being unfair with your sentiment towards those who will not help themselves.
As far as defense spending goes, that's a slippery slope with all this is happening in the world. We need our military to be all it can be. (no pun intended) I would submit that we stop the gouging. $45,000 toilet seats and $16,000 hammers, etc. need to stop. I would suggest an audit and make our military budget much more efficient, while increasing it's might. I'm also in favor of either making it much more enticing for high school graduates to enter service, or make it a 2 year mandatory program, after which all college would be paid as long as the student maintains a 2.5 GPA.