Interesting Tweet

[Good Times Good Times]

https://twitter.com/limonpoker?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

"Basically everyone agrees individuals shouldn't own WMDs. A weapon that can kill 50 in minutes and mow down school children IS A WMD. Period"

Convince me a weapon that can kill 50 in minutes isn't a WEAPON of MASS destruction.

 

[9andaWiggle]

How about an F350 driven through a crowd at 100 mph? WMD or no?

 

[Greg T.]

A person has the right, according to the constitution, to own and carry any weapon that is available to U.S. military. "Arms" are arms. The constitution does not classify nor determine "what" weapons may be owned or carried. The purpose of owning a weapon is not only to protect oneself, but also families and property. And, not just from other citizens, but from the government as well.

 

[livespive]

I'm with 9 on that one. Truck cut the gas line in a building etc.

 

[WAMO]

RIDDLE ME THIS BATMAN. IF THE SUPREME COURT MAKES A DECISION TO DETERMINE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "ARMS" AND "WEAPONS", WHERE WILL THAT LEAD? IF SOMETHING IS DETERMINED TO BE A WEAPON, THAT WOULD NOT FALL UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

 

[WAMO]

AND IT IS SAD WHEN SOMEONE GETS BEHIND THE WHEEL OF ANY VEHICLE TO CAUSE HARM. BUT WITHOUT VEHICLES TO DELIVER GUNS TO THE GUN STORES, G COULDNT STOCKPILE HIS ARSENAL.

 

[9andaWiggle]

How about a man with a machete at Chuck E Cheese chopping up little kids? WMD or no?

 

[Good Times Good Times]

You won't find a better discussion than this on the matter: