AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Why are the following points rarely (if ever) mentioned in the lamestream media?
* Ted Cruz keeps saying that people are rallying behind his campaign, yet in five of the last six GOP primaries (New York, Maryland, Delaware, Rhode Island and Conncecticut), Cruz finished THIRD (behind Donald Trump and John Kasich), belying that contention.
* For several weeks, Cruz prodded Kasich to get out of the race because Kasich didn't have any path to reach 1,237 delegates ... but why shouldn't Cruz get out, now that HE can't reach 1,237 delegates, either.
* Prior to the six most-recent primaries, Cruz finished THIRD in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia and Virginia, and he finished FOURTH in Massachusetts, Vermont and the District of Columbia.
* A majority of Cruz victories have come in states that conduct caucuses or states (such as Colorado and Wyoming) where non-establishment politicians don't vote at all.
* African-Americans were denied the right to vote in Colorado. But when EVERYONE (except the political insiders) is denied a vote, that seems to be OK with the lamestream media and others.
* Members of the Republican establishment feel that they know better than the people who should be the GOP nominee. And they are trying to force a contested convention where THEY can select the nominee.
* Cruz and some members of the GOP establishment keep pointing to polls that indicate that Trump would lose big to Hillary Clinton in November ... BUT those polls generally sample 300 or 400 people ... and that ignores the MILLIONS of people who have voted for Trump IN THE POLLS THAT COUNT.
* Cruz continues to argue that a majority of Republicans don't want Trump, but by that reasoning, a much-larger percentage of Republicans apparently don't want Cruz.
* How about home-state results? With a 17-candidate field in Texas, Trump finished second to Cruz with 26.7% of the vote, and with a 3-candidate field in New York, Cruz finished THIRD with 14.5% (while Trump received 60.4%).
* Cruz made his "New York values" remark while campaigning in Iowa in a 17-candidate field ... but in Iowa, Trump got 10% more votes than Cruz did in New York in a 3-candidate field.
* Many Trump supporters voted GOP for the first time, and some had never previously voted at all. And is there any doubt that Trump has the potential to get more votes from independents and moderate Democrats than Cruz would?
* Why should anyone pay attention to so-called expert pundits, NONE who were anywhere near correct about Trump (and his success) from Day 1 to today?.
* Democratic chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz keeps defending Hillary Clinton to the hilt, but on the GOP side, the establishment continues attempts to take down its party's front-runner.
* Ted Cruz keeps saying that people are rallying behind his campaign, yet in five of the last six GOP primaries (New York, Maryland, Delaware, Rhode Island and Conncecticut), Cruz finished THIRD (behind Donald Trump and John Kasich), belying that contention.
* For several weeks, Cruz prodded Kasich to get out of the race because Kasich didn't have any path to reach 1,237 delegates ... but why shouldn't Cruz get out, now that HE can't reach 1,237 delegates, either.
* Prior to the six most-recent primaries, Cruz finished THIRD in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia and Virginia, and he finished FOURTH in Massachusetts, Vermont and the District of Columbia.
* A majority of Cruz victories have come in states that conduct caucuses or states (such as Colorado and Wyoming) where non-establishment politicians don't vote at all.
* African-Americans were denied the right to vote in Colorado. But when EVERYONE (except the political insiders) is denied a vote, that seems to be OK with the lamestream media and others.
* Members of the Republican establishment feel that they know better than the people who should be the GOP nominee. And they are trying to force a contested convention where THEY can select the nominee.
* Cruz and some members of the GOP establishment keep pointing to polls that indicate that Trump would lose big to Hillary Clinton in November ... BUT those polls generally sample 300 or 400 people ... and that ignores the MILLIONS of people who have voted for Trump IN THE POLLS THAT COUNT.
* Cruz continues to argue that a majority of Republicans don't want Trump, but by that reasoning, a much-larger percentage of Republicans apparently don't want Cruz.
* How about home-state results? With a 17-candidate field in Texas, Trump finished second to Cruz with 26.7% of the vote, and with a 3-candidate field in New York, Cruz finished THIRD with 14.5% (while Trump received 60.4%).
* Cruz made his "New York values" remark while campaigning in Iowa in a 17-candidate field ... but in Iowa, Trump got 10% more votes than Cruz did in New York in a 3-candidate field.
* Many Trump supporters voted GOP for the first time, and some had never previously voted at all. And is there any doubt that Trump has the potential to get more votes from independents and moderate Democrats than Cruz would?
* Why should anyone pay attention to so-called expert pundits, NONE who were anywhere near correct about Trump (and his success) from Day 1 to today?.
* Democratic chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz keeps defending Hillary Clinton to the hilt, but on the GOP side, the establishment continues attempts to take down its party's front-runner.