Here's a right winger on Trump

bbfreeburn

Active Member
Trump’s self-destruction begins early

By Jennifer Rubin May 9 at 10:15 AM

We suspect that when he gave Donald Trump the opportunity to unify the party, Speaker of the House Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) knew Trump wouldn’t be able to do it. Someone as narcissistic and as devoid of conservative principles as Trump couldn’t become a conciliatory, minimally coherent Republican. Still, he probably did not expect Trump to blow it so quickly and vividly.

In the space of a few days, Trump’s campaign chief, Paul Manafort, told movement conservatives that the agenda of the GOP is now whatever Trump believes (which varies from day to day). Trump declared that “don’t forget, this is called the Republican Party. It’s not called the Conservative Party.” This is a man with no grounding in any ideology, telling the party that being Republican means whatever he wants it to mean. Great way to chase those people for whom politics is about something other than winning and losing, huh?

Donald Trump vs. Paul Ryan: Can they work it out?
Embed Share
Play Video1:40
House Speaker Paul Ryan says he cannot support Donald Trump. Trump says he doesn't care. Can the two work out their differences? (Deirdra O'Regan/The Washington Post)
Trump reversed himself on the minimum wage and now vows to raise taxes. Those Republicans who said the party had to fall in line behind him or we’d have tax increases, job-killing minimum wage hikes and socialized medicine — all things he said at one time or another that he wants –need a new excuse to back the billionaire mogul. Having supported him based on the hope his tax plan would last a millisecond after his nomination, leaders of anti-tax groups — or really any group with “conservative” in its name — look like chumps.


It is not simply that Trump lacks consistent conservative principles; rather, he lacks any principles whatsoever. Republicans who argue he has to be elected because the Supreme Court swing seat is at issue need to explain why they have the least bit of confidence in Trump’s pick. If he thought it would be to his advantage to nominate a liberal justice, he surely would. Moreover, he is unlikely to be able to discern the next David Souter from the next Antonin Scalia.

Most horrifying for Republicans, Trump now declares the party does not have to be united. “Does the party have to be together? Does it have to be unified? I’m very different than everybody else — perhaps that’s ever run for office,” he said. “I actually don’t think so.” Huh?! Wasn’t he saying just weeks ago he could unite the party? Right now Trump has less than 85 percent of Republicans, historically very low. With that many defections and his massive problem with women and minorities, he is putting states in play — for Hillary Clinton. A recent Georgia poll has the two statistically tied. He may be the first presidential candidate in history who doesn’t want votes from his own party.
 

sevenpin63

Addicted Member
Sounds like a bunch of sore loosers. The pendants have been wrong at every turn on Trump and so is the old guard of the GOP.
Trump will win in a landslide
 

Greg T.

The Jizz Slinger
Plus, you can't believe the lame stream media about anything. They're going to embellish Killary's numbers at every opportunity. She hasn't a snowball's chance in hell of beating Trump at the polls. And Bernie, an old socialist hanger-on from the 60s. Stick a fork in him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLS

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
She hasn't a snowball's chance in hell of beating Trump at the polls.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

And Bernie, an old socialist hanger-on from the 60s. Stick a fork in him.
I do think he's done. From a campaign strategist POV I think he's waiting to see what the FBI does about the e-mails thing. If charges are brought he's in. Will they be? Most likely not, but that's "why".
 

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
I find it interesting that the article points out that Trump declares that the GOP doesn't have to be unified.

Why doesn't the writer ask GEORGE WILL, MITT ROMNEY, PAUL RYAN, LINDSEY GRAHAM, etc., etc., about unity? People like that don't seem to be interested in "unity" at all ... so do we really need divisive (and borderline hateful) people like that on the Trump Train?
 

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
AW you are fixated on people that do not matter. You are so concerned about what establishment republicans are doing rather than what YOUR candidate is doing. Bizarre.

YOUR candidate won the nomination. Focus on that.

I've never seen a winner worry so much about the losers.
 

bbfreeburn

Active Member
AW you are fixated on people that do not matter. You are so concerned about what establishment republicans are doing rather than what YOUR candidate is doing. Bizarre.

YOUR candidate won the nomination. Focus on that.

I've never seen a winner worry so much about the losers.
perhaps because his winner is a loser?
 

Good Times Good Times

Active Member
perhaps because his winner is a loser?
Well, that's a separate discussion. My point is that Mitt/Ryan LOST, Lyin' Ted LOST, Little Marco LOST............Trump objectively won. That's AW's guy. It would be like Bernie winning and me carrying on about Hillary/O'Malley/Howard Dean or something.

I just find it intriguing someone would do that. This should be an exciting time for AW, that's "him" up there at the podium. :D
 

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
AW you are fixated on people that do not matter. You are so concerned about what establishment republicans are doing rather than what YOUR candidate is doing. Bizarre.

YOUR candidate won the nomination. Focus on that.

I've never seen a winner worry so much about the losers.
Dear GTGT:

The media "experts" and pundits are far more concerned about "unity" than I am. And it's not Trump that is opposing unity, it's some of the "establishment" Republicans.
 

9andaWiggle

Addicted Member
GTGT - I Think the problem is how all the "establishment" Republicans made such a fuss about pressuring The Donald to sign this agreement to support the eventual nominee, unite with the Republicans, and not run an independent campaign that would sabotage their chances in the general election, but are unwilling to give the same respect to the nominee chosen by THE PEOPLE.

It'll be tough enough to beat Hillary, harder yet to beat Hillary AND half the Republicans who, prior to the nominee being chosen, were so concerned and emphatic about uniting to beat the Democrats.

And that makes me want to see Trump win that much more. I'm having a ball watching their entitled little worlds get flipped upside down. The squirming, the hand-wringing, the little tantrums thrown in the media. Simply awesome.

Stay tuned, we might be seeing something that will get written into the history books!
 

AlwaysWrite

Addicted Member
Sir...
The loser here is the American people...All we have is shixxt running for office...A hunch back old goat...A hag with sagging boobs...and a wild man with a bad hairdo...

which is why


we're screwed
... but keep in mind that no honest, mainstream American has any chance to seriously compete for the presidency unless he/she is endorsed and/or accepted by the establishment or -- as in the case of Trump -- very, very rich.
 
Top