I think it depends on the actions and history of each individual.
If someone with no criminal history, and no known online threats - basically someone who showed up to legitimately protest peacefully and was merely a part of the group, I would agree with a lesser sentence.
Those busting open doors, destroying property, stealing property, physically assaulting others, or those with past criminal activity and/or known documented threats toward the government I could see receiving much harsher penalties based on their actions.
A judge and/or jury will have to decide the fate of each individual. After all, they still have the right to a fair trial.
By the way, I think the same for all the other protesters this year. The ones that are not peaceful should be held accountable, but funny, I don't hear about everyone on the internet going out of their way to identify the rioters/looters that destroyed poor neighborhoods under the guise of "demanding justice". So... double standard?