The debate

[Greg T.]

Dear WAMO:

The subject of this thread is THE DEBATE, and Jorgensen was nowhere near the debate stage! Therefore, regardless of her qualifications and policies, she can't come close to winning, and for America to continue winning over the next few years, it should be clear that Trump is a far-better choice than Biden!

Especially when Biden is just a front for the democrat party. They have absolutely NO desire for him to run the country.

 

[Greg T.]

 

[WAMO]

The debate definitely solidified my choice in presidential candidates:

Jo Jorgensen for President.

 

[WAMO]

Dear Scolai:

Jo is certainly a far-wiser option than Sleepy Joe!

 

[Djarum300]

Jo Jorgensen double down on BLM so that's a no vote for me.mi voted Gary Johnson in 16.

 

[Scolai]

Jo Jorgensen double down on BLM so that's a no vote for me.mi voted Gary Johnson in 16.

She supports the movement (equity for blacks) but not the organization (the Marxist-led anti-American group).

I saw her in Durham in August. She said as much from the podium.

 

[Greg T.]

She supports the movement (equity for blacks) but not the organization (the Marxist-led anti-American group).

I saw her in Durham in August. She said as much from the podium.

There's gotta be something I'm missing. Equity for blacks? Does that mean they will be reduced to having to live the way the whites do? No special college privileges? No affirmative action? No more dedicated TV networks, etc? They'll also have to play by the same rules as we do?

 

[Djarum300]

She supports the movement (equity for blacks) but not the organization (the Marxist-led anti-American group).

I saw her in Durham in August. She said as much from the podium.

Equity for blacks is anti libertarian in my view. (Equality != Equity).

 

[Djarum300]

There's gotta be something I'm missing. Equity for blacks? Does that mean they will be reduced to having to live the way the whites do? No special college privileges? No affirmative action? No more dedicated TV networks, etc? They'll also have to play by the same rules as we do?

I think people get confused between equality and equity. Specifically equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome, which is very close in definition to equity. The left banks on this.

I'm all for equality of opportunity. It's extremely difficult (and unethical IMHO) to legislate equality of outcome in both representation or means income.

We'd only have 18 percent NBA league of African Americans. Who'd lose their shit over that?

Why should a salaried person who output is less than someone else's get the same salary?

 

[Greg T.]

I think people get confused between equality and equity. Specifically equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome, which is very close in definition to equity. The left banks on this.

I'm all for equality of opportunity. It's extremely difficult (and unethical IMHO) to legislate equality of outcome in both representation or means income.

We'd only have 18 percent NBA league of African Americans. Who'd lose their shit over that?

Why should a salaried person who output is less than someone else's get the same salary?

I'm all in with that. Equality is equality. But when equality turns to priority and superiority I take issue. As I mentioned above, blacks are awarded many perks and privileges that whites are not. Dare I even mention that we should be offered the same? There is a measurable outcome when addressing affirmative action and the UNCF.