I have an interesting topic, just noticed it today, but it has been around for a while:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/su...e-sex-couple/ar-BBGgG6E?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=ientp
What do you think?
If a person has a shop that is on a public street, and open to the public, should he have to sell to all of the public?
Granted there are signs that say No shoes, No shirt, No service, but that can be fixed and then you are welcomed in......
I am talking about him refusing to bake for the same sex couple. I guess in my opinion this is a step back because he could he could have easily said that he didn't want to bake for Blacks, or for Jews, or for Muslims etc.
I think that if he wants to have that kind of choice he needs to be a home baker in a private location.
But if he is using a public location, or the internet he should sell to all, or (and that is a BIG OR) post on the front of the building who is will not serve (I don't think that will do his business any good).
Thoughts??
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/su...e-sex-couple/ar-BBGgG6E?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=ientp
What do you think?
If a person has a shop that is on a public street, and open to the public, should he have to sell to all of the public?
Granted there are signs that say No shoes, No shirt, No service, but that can be fixed and then you are welcomed in......
I am talking about him refusing to bake for the same sex couple. I guess in my opinion this is a step back because he could he could have easily said that he didn't want to bake for Blacks, or for Jews, or for Muslims etc.
I think that if he wants to have that kind of choice he needs to be a home baker in a private location.
But if he is using a public location, or the internet he should sell to all, or (and that is a BIG OR) post on the front of the building who is will not serve (I don't think that will do his business any good).
Thoughts??