potential killers That's the thing.....
That works with my example as well, you are trying to use blanket enforcement based on the fact of potential killers.
All Muslims are not violent, just like all of Islam is not...
Christianity has its fair share of blood.
That works with my example as well, you are trying to use blanket enforcement based on the fact of potential killers.
All Muslims are not violent, just like all of Islam is not...
Christianity has its fair share of blood.
So, if a certain religion is teaching their worshippers to kill, rape, maim, etc. anyone who does not convert, we should not take any action to slow the influx of those people? According to the constitution that is dereliction of duty for not protecting our citizens. The 14th amendment promises equal protection of the law. WHY should we allow the free flow of potential killers? That's not protection.