AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
... but more importantly, the Democrats are "not on the same page" as the Constitution!
Mini-editorial: Baseless impeachment process reached a new low
- Thread starter AlwaysWrite
- Start date
- Status
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear WAMO:
How many times do I have to say it?
Bolton can only testify as to what Trump CONSIDERED doing, but that was something that HE ACTUALLY NEVER DID!
If you know additional FACTS -- aside from the BS offered by CNN and/or MSNBC -- please let me know.
And even if Trump DID what they are alleging, IT'S NOT A CRIME, and hence, not impeachable.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
To all:
PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT GREG SAID (in the above-quoted post)!
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear 9andaWiggle:
There is no need for additional facts BECAUSE TRUMP IS NOT GUILTY OF A CRIME. In fact, there is no crime alleged in the articles of impeachment.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear Greg T and others:
Greg gets it … but If others want to talk about witnesses, THE DEMOCRATS CALLED 17 WITNESSES in their impeachment proceedings, while NO TRUMP ADVOCATES TESTIFIED.
Now, the Democrats want to call more witnesses -- when the witness "score" is already 17-0 -- and at the same time, THEY WANT TO KEEP REPUBLCIANS FROM CALLING ANY WITNESSES?
If you're in favor of that, your thinking isn't very clear.
Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
No doubt. They've already got Trump at the gallows!
REVerse °
Addicted Member
I think a more sinister problem(s) are being camouflaged by the impeachment debate.
It comes in the form of China and the Coronavirus. The other is the sheer depth of Burisma and Ukraine. Epstein knew a lot. No one involved is safe.
Gentlemen, my hand is out for shaking. This has been a lively debate and each of us know where we stand. It is plain to see that some CHOOSE to be informed by mainstream media and others dig deeper and decide for themselves.
We have reached an impasse.
I’m out.
Peace
REV
It comes in the form of China and the Coronavirus. The other is the sheer depth of Burisma and Ukraine. Epstein knew a lot. No one involved is safe.
Gentlemen, my hand is out for shaking. This has been a lively debate and each of us know where we stand. It is plain to see that some CHOOSE to be informed by mainstream media and others dig deeper and decide for themselves.
We have reached an impasse.
I’m out.
Peace
REV
Last edited:
Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
Unfortunately, Rev, there will always be those who find what they want to hear from multiple sources without regard for the rest. When I watch CBS and ABC nightly news I just cringe at how they twist, turn and cobble shit together. I watched the first day of defense opening statements and I CLEARLY came away with them completely destroying the dems openings. Funny, the news saw them as very weak, and really carrying no substance. HUH?
9andaWiggle
Addicted Member
OK. Then why is the Senate hearing even taking place then? My question isn't about what the Dems did in the House. My question is about actions in the Senate.
Like you said, the House had their turn, so why, since it appears the Senate is considering hearing witness testimony, are there discussion about trades and deals on who testifies? Either the Senate calls who they want to hear from or they don't. WHY THE NEGOTIATIONS FOR WITNESSES? I fail to understand why that is even a thing.
Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
I fail to understand how the Senate can accept the articles of impeachment when, clearly, there are no crimes defined in the documents! This entire ordeal should have been tossed as soon as it was read. There are NO criminal charges.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
… and not only that, NONE OF THE HOUSE SUBPOENAS ARE VALID because they were issued without being authorized by a full vote of the House.
JUDGE ROBERTS, NO WHISTLEBLOWER, PERIOD. I WILL SAY IT AGAIN, NUMBER 20, ITS ALL A FIASCO. JUST BECAUSE I DONT WATCH YOUR CHANNEL, DOESNT MEAN THE ONES I WATCH ARE ANY WORSE THAN YOURS, WHOMEVER YOU ARE. WHEN YOU WATCH A NEWS CHANNEL THAT SAYS WHAT YOU WANT TO HEAR, THAT DOESNT MAKE THEM RIGHT. JUST LIKE G SAID IN A COUPLA POSTS UP, THAT ONLY MEANS THEY SEE THINGS YOUR WAY. AND THAT DOESNT MAKE THEM RIGHT, WHOMEVER YOU ARE. JUST MEANS THEY SEE THINGS YOUR WAY.
DIDNT HAVE A FULL VOTE OF THE DEM RUN HOUSE FOR SUBPOENAS? REALLY? ONLY NEED MAJORITY, RIGHT?
WONDER WHY THEY ACCEPTED THE ARTICLES BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CRIME? UMM, TRIAL IS TAKING PLACE. AND THE SITTING IMPARCIAL JUDGE DOESNT SEE THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH MOVING FORWARD?
CURRENT POLE: BELIEVE BOLTON OVER TRUMP 45% BELIEVE TRUMP OVER BOLTON 39%
WONDER WHY THEY ACCEPTED THE ARTICLES BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CRIME? UMM, TRIAL IS TAKING PLACE. AND THE SITTING IMPARCIAL JUDGE DOESNT SEE THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH MOVING FORWARD?
CURRENT POLE: BELIEVE BOLTON OVER TRUMP 45% BELIEVE TRUMP OVER BOLTON 39%
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Dear WAMO:
OK. Everyone, including the president, must prove their innocence regardless of whether the charges are valid. No one should be guaranteed due process. Adhering to the U.S. Constitution is optional, rather than required. CNN and MSNBC are not fake news. Trump's lawyers didn't come close to rebuking the impeachment charges. Bolton and Mulvaney should testify, but the GOP isn't entitled to any witnesses.
Now, are you satisfied?
Greg T.
The Jizz Slinger
Well, as I stated before, here's proof of Bolton's credibility:
9andaWiggle
Addicted Member
I think it means you need to get into the new millenium and upgrade from Windows98!SORRY G, I CANT OPEN THAT THREAD. SAYS MY BROWSER DOESNT SUPPORT IT. WHATEVER THAT MEANS.
AlwaysWrite
Addicted Member
Indeed … and Hannity played that video THREE TIMES last night. And if Bolton were to testify, he'd have a hard time testifying as to what the Democrats would want him to say.
- Status