9andaWiggle
Addicted Member
The one problem I have with Livespive's proposition is that rural or less populated areas, a decent portion of the country, will have absolutely no voice in the government. What works for Kansas City doesn't necessarily work for Garden City. And vice versa. We need those voices to be heard so, in a functional, reasonable government (which we don't currently have) cause and effect can be discussed and compromise can be reached.
That's one thing I like about states having multiple representatives assigned for different districts.
That said, I think each electoral vote should be assigned individually, not winner take all. So even if one district in TX votes Dem, that electoral vote should go to Hillary. If one district in CA votes Rep, that electoral vote should go to Trump (assuming these are the candidates).
Then we just need to clean up the issue of gerrymandering.
That's one thing I like about states having multiple representatives assigned for different districts.
That said, I think each electoral vote should be assigned individually, not winner take all. So even if one district in TX votes Dem, that electoral vote should go to Hillary. If one district in CA votes Rep, that electoral vote should go to Trump (assuming these are the candidates).
Then we just need to clean up the issue of gerrymandering.