Why, that's impossible. I'm pretty sure Bombs have been banned and are ILLEGAL for people to have!
Wait, was it an "Assault Bomb", or just a stick of dynamite that rednecks use for fishing?
Armed teachers should be random and unknown to everyone but administrators and those who carry the guns.Lt. Col. Dave Grossman's book "On Killing" is required reading for anyone who wants to talk intelligently about arming teachers (or other non-LEO/military members of society). He writes extensively about the difficulty of close-quarters killing.
Another consideration is the damage having a weapon will do to teacher/student relationships. A teacher with a gun is far less approachable to students (most students, anyway), making it more difficult to maximize the teacher/student relationship.
Justna thought.
MY THOUGHT IS, IF A TEACHER TAKES SOME FORM OF TEST TO SEE IF THEY ARE MENTALY CAPABLE OF BEING ARMED, IF THEY FAIL THAT TEST, HOW CAN THEY STAY A TEACHER? AND IF A TEACHER GETS A GUN, IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME EVERYONE WILL KNOW. NOW THE GUY THAT CANT BUY ONE, WILL JUST TAKE IT FROM THE TEACHER.
The idea is to rotate a few on every floor or section of the building so that the info does not get out.G, YOU KNOW AS WELL AS I DO, THAT IT WOULD GET OUT WHO IS CARRYING. IF THEY ARENT WEARING IT ON THEIR HIP, WHAT GOOD IS IT?
Never thought about the student, teacher relationship. That is something to think about.Lt. Col. Dave Grossman's book "On Killing" is required reading for anyone who wants to talk intelligently about arming teachers (or other non-LEO/military members of society). He writes extensively about the difficulty of close-quarters killing.
Another consideration is the damage having a weapon will do to teacher/student relationships. A teacher with a gun is far less approachable to students (most students, anyway), making it more difficult to maximize the teacher/student relationship.
Justna thought.
Why would that need to be in the public domain? If someone is unfit, ex-felon, whatever, it's nobody's business. AND, nobody should know who is packing for the week.MY THOUGHT THERE WAS LIVE, IF A TEACHER IS FOUND NOT COMPETENT TO CARRY, WHAT WAS THE REASON? ARE PARENTS THEN GOING TO SAY ARE THEY CAPABLE OF TEACHING MY KIDS PROPERLY? THAT COULD BE A MAJOR SLIPPERY SLOPE.
Why would that need to be in the public domain? If someone is unfit, ex-felon, whatever, it's nobody's business. AND, nobody should know who is packing for the week.
Nope. Absolutely not. We don't need parents attacking "retarded" teachers when their kid is too fucking lazy to score over D- in a class.EVERY ONE OF THOSE REASONS SHOULD BE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE FOR A TEACHER G!
You have no way of knowing any of that. And if a school doesn't enough staff to carry then we can use national guard.NOT ENOUGH TEACHERS TO ROTATE G. TO MANY WONT WANT THE GUN, SOME MAY NOT PASS THE TESTS, SOME WOULD NOT HAVE THE TIME TO DO THE TRAINING, SOME COULD NOT KEEP IT SECRET AND I GUARANTEE THE PARENTS WOULD WANT TO KNOW WHO IS AND ISNT CARRYING. AND YES, IT IS THEIR BUSINESS. AND WHO WOULD PAY FOR SAID TRAINING? AND MENTAL EXAMS? AND THE INSURANCE THE SCHOOLS WOULD HAVE TO START PAYING FOR WEAPONS ON SITE? AND WHAT POLICE STATION WOULD WANT TO DEAL WITH STORING AND BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID GUNS? SHIT COMES UP MISSING FROM THEIR PROPERTY / ARMORY ROOMS ALL THE TIME. AND WHAT BAD GUY MIGHT BE WAITING ON THAT PRINCIPLE AT SCHOOL KNOWING HE IS BRINGING GUNS AND AMMO?